Dr. Peter McCullough – The Vaccine as the Manifest Destiny of the Pandemic

Share

In this explosive interview, cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough speaks to Dr. Sam Dubé as to why he, as well as a multitude of highly credentialed, experienced, and lauded physicians and researchers feel that “all roads lead to the vaccine”.

Listen to his interview:

Dr. Peter McCullough

Dr. Peter McCullough

Dr. Peter McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, in academic medical practice in Dallas, Texas, USA. He maintains ABIM certification in internal medicine and cardiovascular diseases. He practices both internal medicines including the management of common infectious diseases as well as the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID-19 vaccine.

Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.

He has 46 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis. Dr. McCullough has broadly published on a range of topics in medicine with > 1000 publications and > 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine.  

On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response. Dr. McCullough has had one full year of dedicated academic and clinical efforts in combating the SARS-CoV-2 virus and in doing so, has reviewed thousands of reports, participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, press releases, and has been considered among the world’s experts on COVID-19.

Early COVID Treatment Saves Lives

The customary of take care of COVID-19 has been to withhold remedy till an individual is sick sufficient to be hospitalized. It sometimes takes two to 3 weeks for somebody with COVID-19 to get sick sufficient to be hospitalized, and through that point early remedy may be lifesaving.

The rationale was that there have been no massive, randomized trials performed to know which therapies are secure and efficient, however as McCullough stated, “We can’t wait for large randomized trials … Something got in the minds of doctors and nurses and everyone to not treat COVID-19. I couldn’t stand it.” He and colleagues labored feverishly to determine a remedy — why did not nationwide well being organizations accomplish that additionally?

“Our government and other governments, and the entire world, has not lifted a finger to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death anywhere,” McCullough stated, mentioning the irony: “If there was a kid with asthma, would we let the kid wheeze and choke for two weeks before the kid has to go to the hospital? No, we give the child medications. We don’t have randomized trials for every single thing that we do.”2

McCullough and colleagues realized that there are three main phases to COVID-19. It begins with virus replication, which then triggers irritation, or a cytokine storm. This, in flip, results in blood clotting. If sufficient micro blood clots type within the lungs, an individual cannot get sufficient oxygen and dies. It’s a fancy course of, and no single drug goes to work to deal with it, which is why McCullough makes use of a mixture of medicine, as is finished to deal with HIV, staph and different infections.

Only about 6% of docs’ choices in cardiology are based mostly on randomized trials. “Medicine is an art and a science, it takes judgment. What was happening is, I think out of global fear, no judgement was happening,” McCullough stated,3 referring to docs’ refusal to deal with COVID-19 sufferers early on within the illness course of.

Doctors Threatened for Treating COVID-19

Around the world, the unthinkable is going on: Doctors are being threatened with lack of their license and even jail for attempting to assist their sufferers. French physician Didier Raoult advised, early on, placing up a tent to attempt to deal with covid-19 sufferers. He was placed on home arrest. He has promoted using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which initially was obtainable over-the-counter — till France made it prescription solely.4

In Australia, if a physician makes an attempt to deal with a COVID-19 affected person with HCQ, they might be put in jail. “Since when does a doctor get put in prison to try to help a patient with a simple generic drug?” McCullough stated. In South Africa, he added, a physician was put in jail for prescribing ivermectin.

In August 2020, McCullough’s landmark paper “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection” was printed on-line within the American Journal of Medicine.5

The follow-up paper is titled “Multifaceted Highly Targeted Sequential Multidrug Treatment of Early Ambulatory High-Risk SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19)” and was printed in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine in December 2020.6 It grew to become the idea for the house remedy information.

While some doctor organizations have stepped up and are treating COVID-19 sufferers, “The ivory tower today still is not treating patients. The party line in my health system is, do not treat a COVID-19 patient as an outpatient. Wait for them to get sick enough to be admitted. Because my health system … follows the National Institutes of Health or the Centers for Disease Control, period.”

Conditioned to Wait for an Injection

With no hope of early remedy, McCullough believes that most individuals grew to become conditioned to attend for an injection. “We became conditioned, after about May or so, to wear a mask, wait in isolation and be saved by the vaccine. And wait for the vaccine. And all we could hear about is the vaccine.”

The injections have been developed, however they’re totally different than any prior vaccines and have been shedding effectiveness whereas inflicting an unacceptable variety of critical accidents and deaths. For comparability, in 1976, a fast-tracked injection program in opposition to swine flu was halted after an estimated 25 to 32 deaths.7

According to McCullough within the video, if a brand new drug comes available on the market and 5 deaths happen, the usual is to challenge a black field warning stating the remedy could trigger demise. With 50 deaths, the product is pulled from the market, he says. Now think about this: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database confirmed that — for all vaccines mixed earlier than 2020 — there have been about 158 whole deaths reported per 12 months.

By January 22, 2021, there have been already 182 deaths reported for COVID-19 injections, with simply 27.1 million folks vaccinated. This was greater than sufficient to succeed in the mortality sign of concern to cease this system, McCullough stated.

“We’ve already crossed the line of concern January 22. And if there was a data safety monitoring board — I know, because I do this work — we would have had an emergency meeting and said, wait a minute, people are dying after the vaccine. We’ve got to figure out why.”8

It’s customary to have an exterior vital occasion committee, an exterior knowledge security monitoring board and a human ethics committee for giant scientific trials — such because the mass COVID-19 injection program, however these weren’t put into place.

“This is something we’ve never seen in human medicine — a new product introduced and just going full-steam ahead with no check on why people are dying after the vaccine,” McCullough stated. On two events, the CDC and FDA — in March and in June — reviewed the info and stated not one of the deaths are associated to the vaccines. “I think this is malfeasance,” he acknowledged.

Fast-forward to July 30, 2021, and VAERS knowledge confirmed 12,366 Americans have died after a COVID0-19 injection.9 In an evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine demise reviews from VAERS, researchers discovered that 86% of the time, nothing else may have brought about the demise, and it seems the vaccine was the trigger.10

The Spike Protein Is Dangerous

Your physique acknowledges the spike protein in COVID-19 jabs as international, so it begins to fabricate antibodies to guard you in opposition to COVID-19, or so the idea goes. But there’s an issue. The spike protein itself is harmful and identified to flow into in your physique at the very least for weeks and extra possible months11 — maybe for much longer — after the COVID jab.

In your cells, the spike protein damages blood vessels and might result in the event of blood clots.12 It can go into your mind, adrenal glands, ovaries, coronary heart, skeletal muscle tissues and nerves, inflicting irritation, scarring and harm in organs over time. McCullough additionally believes that the spike protein is current in donated blood, and so they’ve notified the Red Cross and the American Association of Blood Banking.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) platforms have been underneath examine for years, usually being designed to interchange a faulty gene, which may doubtlessly be used for most cancers or coronary heart failure remedy, for instance.

In November 2020, nevertheless, Pfizer, in a three way partnership with Germany-based BioNTech, introduced that their mRNA-based injection was “more than 90% effective” in a Phase 3 trial.13 This doesn’t imply that 90% of people that get injected will likely be protected against COVID-19, because it’s based mostly on relative threat discount (RRR).

The absolute threat discount (ARR) for the jab is lower than 1%. “Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the jab, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a jab, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs,” researchers wrote in The Lancet Microbe in April 2021.14

McCullough believes the mass injection marketing campaign is an unbelievable violation of human ethics, partially as a result of nobody ought to be pressured, coerced or threatened into utilizing an investigational product.

No makes an attempt have been made to current or mitigate dangers to the general public, reminiscent of giving it solely to individuals who actually need it — to not low threat teams like youngsters and younger folks and people who are naturally resistant to COVID-19 attributable to prior an infection. “I think this is the most disturbing thing,” he stated.

The Injections Don’t Stop COVID-19, Can Be Deadly

The CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) posted on-line July 30, 2021, particulars an outbreak of COVID-19 that occurred in Barnstable County, Massachusetts — 74% of the circumstances occurred in totally vaccinated folks.15

Indiscriminate vaccination is driving mutations, because the virus is mutating wildly to evade the injections. Their effectiveness, too, is quickly waning. A examine printed in medRxiv, utilizing knowledge from the Mayo Clinic Health System, revealed that in intervals of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence, Moderna’s injection was 76% efficient whereas Pfizer’s effectiveness was solely 42%.16

Somewhat-known truth is that Moderna’s jab has 3 times the dose of Pfizer’s, however, curiously, well being officers aren’t even discussing this or giving the general public updates on which of the three injections work “best.” The narrative is straightforward and easy — get an injection, any injection.

Yet, as McCullough famous, the virus has mutated, and the vaccines aren’t working the way in which well being officers had hoped: “The vaccines don’t stop COVID-19, at least not completely, and they’re not a shield against mortality.”17

Similar to VAERS, the U.Ok. maintains a “Yellow Card” reporting web site to report opposed results to vaccines and medicines.18

Tess Lawrie, whose firm The Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy has labored with the World Health Organization, analyzed U.Ok. Yellow Card knowledge and concluded that there is greater than sufficient proof to drag the injections from the market as a result of they don’t seem to be secure for human use. The report acknowledged:19

“It is now apparent that these products in the blood stream are toxic to humans. An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required whilst a full and independent safety analysis is undertaken to investigate the full extent of the harms, which the UK Yellow Card data suggest include thromboembolism, multisystem inflammatory disease, immune suppression, autoimmunity and anaphylaxis, as well as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).”

Early Treatment Is Crucial

McCullough is attempting to get the phrase out in regards to the significance of early remedy of COVID-19. Early ambulatory remedy with a sequenced-multidrug routine is supported by obtainable sources of proof and has a optimistic benefit-to-risk profile to scale back the chance of hospitalization and demise.

At 53:40 within the video, you may view McCullough’s early remedy routine, which initially features a nutraceutical bundle. While you are recovering at dwelling, open your home windows and get loads of recent air and air flow in your house.

If signs persist or worsen, he recommends calling your physician and demanding monoclonal antibody remedy. The remedy progresses to incorporate anti-infectives like HCQ or ivermectin, antibiotics, steroids and blood thinners.

If your physician refuses to deal with COVID-19 within the early levels, discover a new one and/or go to a telemedicine clinic that may assist, as “the prehospital phase is the time of therapeutic opportunity.”

McCullough is amongst a rising variety of specialists who imagine COVID-19 injections are making the pandemic worse. They “have an unfavorable safety profile and are not clinically effective, thus they cannot be generally supported in clinical practice at this time.”

Logically, that is clear, however McCullough believes we’re coping with a mass psychosis that’s stopping folks from seeing the sunshine. “The whole world is in a trance,” he stated, including:20

“Things are getting disturbingly uncontrolled and it is within the context of the virus. It is obvious … we’re in a really particular time within the historical past of mankind. Whatever is happening, it’s the whole world … each human being on the planet. It seems to have a program.

The program … is going on to advertise as a lot worry, isolation, struggling, hospitalization and demise as a way to get a needle in each arm, in any respect prices. That is what is going on on, and nobody on this room can disagree.”